Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00455
Original file (PD 2013 00455.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  CASE: PD-2013-00455
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140910
SEPARATION DATE: 20040226


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of records reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (63B10/Light Wheeled Vehicle Mechanic) medically separated for a hip condition. This condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent L3/S1 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Persistent pain from hip stress and marfanoid habitus with overuse hip arthraglias conditions were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated right hip pain as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Still have problems with both hips, to include pain during pregnancies and births, cannot jog or run (continue) Sometime need to use a cane. PTSD is still hard-jumpy. Sit with back to wall, defensive, MST has caused a divorce and maybe my current marriage due to intimacy and trust issues. Severely afraid of men. Will not even be in an elevator or small space with a male alone. Sacred all the time. Sleeping problems, fear of the dark, fear someone will injury my children. Alcoholism, which is severe. Getting help.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting right hip condition is addressed below along with the contended mental health condition. The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which her service-connected conditions continue to burden her; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System (DES) has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws.

In additionally, the CI was notified by the Department of the Army that, members diagnosed with mental health (MH) condition(s) that were referred to the DES process between 11 September 2001 through 30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnoses were changed during the DES process, may be eligible for a comprehensive review, IAW Department of Defense Directive.


RATING COMPARISON :
Service IPEB – Dated 20031126
 VA* - (~2.7 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Right Hip Pain 5099-5003 0% Right Hip Stress Reaction 5299-5255 10% 20031208
Mental Health Condition Not Adjudicated No VA Entry 20031208
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 6 (Not in Scope) 20031208
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 20%
*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 200 40326 (most proxima te to date of separation )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Hip Pain. The narrative summary (NARSUM) dated 1 August 2003 (approximately 6 months prior to separation), noted the CI initially presented to sick call in August 2002 with onset of hip pain after advanced individual; pain greater in right hip than left hip. The CI was initially treated conservatively with acetaminophen (Tylenol) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Due to persisted hip pain the CI underwent a bone scan in September 2002 that revealed stress reaction of bilateral hip. Repeat bone scan in January 2003 noted mild persistent stress reactions in hips with interval development of mild bilateral sacroilitis. Radiographic study of the pelvis dated 24 June 2003, demonstrated normal and symmetric hip joints bilaterally, with no evidence of joint effusion or arthritic changes; overall normal pelvis and bilateral hip.

X-rays images of bilateral hip obtained in July 2003, revealed no evidence indicative of sacroilitis. The NARSUM noted a CT scan showed no evidence of joint space narrowing, sclerosis, erosions or blastic or lytic processes. On physical examination, the examiner noted an antalgic gait to the right side and tenderness to palpation of the right superior trochanter. Range-of-motion (ROM) was not recorded. The examiner diagnosed persistent pain of hip, stress reactions and marfanoid habitus, with overuse hip arthraglias. The MEB physical therapy report dated 4 December 2003 (2 months prior to separation), recorded a right hip ROM of 110 degrees (normal 120) and a 5 degrees loss of motion after five repetitions (105 degrees). Measurements of extension were normal with no change with repetition. There was painful motion noted during right hip ROM testing but none during the left hip.

The VA Compensation and Pension examination on 8 December 2003 recorded normal posture and gait. The examiner noted the CI’s hip pain began 6 months after entering service and that at that time the right hip pain was greater than the left hip after prolonged sitting, standing or walking more than a mile. The CI was able to walk on her toes, heels and tandem walk. The CI stated since she stopped running, the hip pain had somewhat improved. ROM of the right hip reflected those of the MEB’s physical therapy

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated right hip pain condition at 0%, coded analogously 5003 (arthritis). The VA granted a 10% rating for each hip, coded analogously as 5299-5255 (femur, impairment) for a diagnosed of left and right hip stress reaction. Following a detailed discussion of the evidence, the Board concluded that the right hip condition was not compensation under any ROM codes, but that there was ample evidence to support application of §4.59 (painful motion) to achieve a minimal compensable rating under VARSD 5099-5003. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a rating of 10% for the right hip pain condition.


Contended PEB Conditions. The Board reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the mental health conditions during processing through the DES. There was no evidence of visits to the emergency room for MH issues, no report of suicidal or homicidal ideations, no psychiatric hospitalizations, violence or legal issues. No MH condition was ever profiled or judged to fail retention standards. There was no performance based evidence from the record that any MH condition significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. The evidence of the available records showed the diagnosis of depression was recorded on the MEB DD Form 2808 (history and physical); however, there were no further supporting documentation in the available evidence other than the above stated that was review by the Board.

Therefore, the Board determined that no MH diagnosis had been changed or eliminated to the CI’s possible disadvantage during DES process. This CI therefore does not appear to meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project. The condition was reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the contended condition and so no additional disability ratings are recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the right hip condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded analogously 5003 IAW VASRD §4.59. In the matter of the contended MH condition, the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend it for additional disability rating. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Right Hip Pain 5099-5003 10%
COMBINED
 10%



The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130515, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150002615 (PD201300455)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01440

    Original file (PD 2012 01440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Trochanteric Bursitis, left & right hip – very hard to get sleep at night; also hard to stand or sit for prolonged periods of time.” SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44 (Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01056

    Original file (PD2011-01056.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded right hip pain secondary to femoral neck stress fracture and left sacroilitis condition on the DA Form 3947 to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. An MRI done at that time noted no evidence of a left hip stress fracture. The CI was seen in follow up by Orthopedics for left hip pain in January 2009 with findings of a positive impingement test in the anterior and posterior left hip and it was noted that the more the CI walked, there...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00569

    Original file (PD2012-00569.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation. Earlier notes in the service treatment record (STR)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02311

    Original file (PD-2013-02311.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The BLEconditions, characterized as “quadriceps tendinopathy” and “stress reaction tibia” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “bilateral knee pain with right greater than left chronic quadriceps tendon insertional pain,” and “bilateral leg pain consistent with posteromedial tibial stress reaction,”as unfitting, rated at 10%, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02128

    Original file (PD-2013-02128.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On exam there was TTP of the neck with negative testing for nervecompression (Spurling’s), with normal ROM and normal bilateral UE examination.At the MEB examination on 21 October 2004, 6 months prior to separation, the CI reported chronic neck pain without radicular symptoms. The NARSUM notes the CI had a history of hip pain (trochanteric bursitis), with normal bilateral hip X-rays.Notes in the STR indicated that in April 2000 the CI reported 5 weeks of right hip pain. At the MEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00854

    Original file (PD 2012 00854.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200854 SEPARATION DATE: 20030102 BOARD DATE: 20130213 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Reserve component First Lieutenant / O-1 (91A 5P/General Ordnance Officer), medically separated for chronic bilateral knee, ankle and hip pain (rated as a single unfitting condition). ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00402

    Original file (PD2012-00402.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI underwent the first MEB exam for bilateral lower leg pain. Alternative coding using the VA rating separating the tendinosis from the Morton neuroma disabilities was also considered reasonable, but would also raise the military- 3 PD1200402 specific issue of fitness when the NARSUM did not specify duty impairment from any mid, or distal foot condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01230

    Original file (PD2013 01230.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    To that end, the evidence for the left hip neuritic post-op pain and right greater trochanteric bursitis conditions are presented separately; with attendant recommendations regarding separate unfitness and separate rating if indicated.The Board first considered if the right greater trochanter bursitis condition, having been de-coupled from the combined PEB adjudication, remained itself unfitting. He continued to complain of right hip pain; however, his left hip pain was much more severe. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01246

    Original file (PD2013 01246.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated “right, dominant, shoulder pain… ,” “right hip pain,” and “bilateral heel pain and right ankle pain” as unfitting, rated 10%, 0% and 0% (respectively), citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Right Shoulder Pain…5099-500310%Right Shoulder Arthritis5010-520110%20091125Right Hip Pain…5099-50030%Right Hip Bursitis5024-525210%Bilateral Heel Pain and Right Ankle Pain…52840%Stress Fracture,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01100

    Original file (PD2012 01100.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted.The PEB adjudicated “bilateral foot and tibial pain”as a single unfitting condition, rated 0%,under criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated. Members first deliberated if the bilateral foot and bilateral tibial conditions were reasonably justified as separately unfitting. In the matter of the servicecombined bilateral tibial and bilateral foot conditions, the Board by a...